Seeing through Layers like Blankets on a Cold Night

My father was am immigrant from Mexico.  My mother a full blood Kiowa/Cherokee from Oklahoma.  They worked the peanut and cotton fields when my sisters and I were young.  I remember ducking the large rolling water sprayers in the fields; I remember the heat coming from the dirt onto my bare feet; and I remember living in abandoned farm houses in the Oklahoma fields.  Let me tell you about cold nights.  No, better yet, let me tell you about the warmth you can have from the thin layer of a blanket.

Farm HousesAs I make progress through the revision stage of my novel, Uncle Called Him Spider, I visualize odd and peculiar moments in my life.  Here I am thinking about point of view, analyzing the spaces between first person narrative and third person limited omniscience, and I start to make the comparison of that space to the thin layer of a blanket on a cold night.  Then I remember the farm houses.

Odd how the memory works.

So a few days ago I was living through a fictional space in my mind where I envisioned someone asking me, “Why did you write Uncle Called Him Spider in third person limited omniscient instead of first person?”  They would go onto explain how the two forms aren’t very far apart structurally.  So many great novels are written in the first person.  Yes, I actually visualize conversations like this.  And, yes, I’m only a breath away from insanity, but only the good writers are.

BlanketsIt’s a good question.  I’m glad the fictive personality in my mind asked.  Why third over first?  I think it goes back to the blanket on the cold night.  So what does first person perspective do?  It pulls the reader in close.  You are directly inside the narrator’s mind and you are watching what the narrator watches.  You only experience what the narrator feels.  You are under the blanket.

So you’re going to argue third person limited does the same thing.  But I’m going to disagree with you.  It does put you, the reader, inside the main character’s mind.  Yes, you feel what she feels and you get to hear her thoughts.  But there is one thing first person doesn’t offer:  Freedom.

With just a thin layer of distance, third person limited omniscient gives the reader a power lost to the first person POV.  Because you are subconsciously noticing the “he said, she said” aspect of the writing, you are then subconsciously implementing the “he said, she said” mentality.  Meaning?  You cast judgment more readily.  You are less likely to identify with the main character and more likely to criticize her.

“The omniscient narrator is a bizarre technique, when you think about it, and no one uses it much anymore. But for the novels I want to write, it’s the only approach that makes sense to me.”  — by Min Jin Lee

Why?  It’s space. Being on the outside of the blanket you still feel the cold night, while the main character is cozy under the blanket.  There’s enough distance to analyze and criticize situations as the main character moves through the storyline.  In essence, it empowers the reader to make their own conclusions without the main character trying to convince them otherwise.

I’m going to take this a little deeper–just for food for thought.  I think it may be an issue of control.  If an author wants you to think a certain way about a character she will do anything and everything to persuade you, like using first person narration.  Now, don’t get upset at me for making this claim.  If you go read the three free short stories on my website, you’ll find three first person short stories.  I write first person.  But as I think about the novel I’m writing I can’t help but wonder how much of it has to do with authorial control over the reader.  Maybe I’m in a space of letting go, ready to give readers their freedom so I can have my own.  Or…maybe I think way too much about this shit. 🙂

Support a Native owned Etsy shop, Allies United, where I offer unique merch for allies of social justice movements, like MMIW, Native Lives Matter and Black Lives Matter. Take a look inside my Etsy shop here:

(The images used in this post were borrowed from Wikimedia and Wikipedia)

(Images were borrowed from and


  1. First person, Third person. This is not what I about in a story. What I look for are the descriptions and the details. The thoughts on the thoughts of thought that makes me judge myself through the experiences of the characters. Yet, still gives me room to imagine what my characters look, sound, feel, and truly are like without my own comparison. I believe if an writer can put me into a place I never been before but my mind can visualize this space as if I been there or am there in the moment than that is what I grade as remarkable and worth reading. I want my spirit to travel along the scenes played out in my mind. Perhaps 1st or 3rd person has an effect to how I do so. But I am just saying I focus on the details so that I can be where my characters are. In the moment.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You touch on very important topics. The visualizing is key to the reader/writer connection. The writer is employed with the task of helping the reader see the world she is creating. And what occurs in return is a participation in the literature. The reader is given an avenue to use their imagination and participate in the process. So the reader and the writer form a bond of sorts, where the two share imaginations together.


  2. As a reader, I find 1st person narration hard work, because of the need to keep reminding yourself that all may not be as it seems: that the narrator may be lying or deluding himself. As a writer, it can be a powerful tool for springing a surprise ending, when the reader discovers that the narrator was mistaken in some regard or even deliberately misleading the reader. A good example is Agatha Christie’s “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd” in which the narrator turns out to be the murderer. I recently read a book in which the 1st person narrator was a man who was divorcing his wife. He gave a very negative two-dimensional picture of his wife and in-laws. I read the whole book waiting vainly for the moment at which we would discover that they actually had hidden depths!

    Most of my own books are 3rd person with limited omniscience, but not restricted to just one main character. I write crime novels involving a team of detectives, so it makes sense to me to have the reader seeing things through the eyes of each of them as they each take a lead temporarily. But it does not make sense to get inside the head of the suspects, who necessarily have to be unknown quantities.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It is amazing how you can describe a theoretical subject in such an artistic way. I could even feel the blanket and the warm. Your style is extremely captivating. Thank you also for appreciating my article. It is an honour! I can’t wait to read more from you!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I agree, all good writers are a breath away from insanity. But this is the only way to make a story come alive. If you don’t believe it, if you can’t see it, how will anyone else?

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s